COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
TAN SIEW NAM & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellate intervention standards. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding trial judge's decision. (Para 6) |
| 3. facts regarding the sale and loan agreements. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
[1] This was an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the High Court at Johor Bahru after a full trial. The learned High Court Judge dismissed the appellant's claim and allowed the respondents' counterclaim.
[2] This appeal concerned specific findings made by the learned High Court Judge. This Court will not readily intervene with the findings of fact arrived at by the trial Court unless there is a fundamental misdirection that warrants appellate intervention. The law reports are replete with authorities setting out instances where appellate intervention was exercised. Abdul Malik Ishak JCA writing a separate judgment in Yoong Sze Fatt v. Pengkalen Securities Sdn Bhd , 2009 MarsdenLR 4322 had this to say on this subject at pp 125 to 126 of the report:
"It would be ideal to set out, briefly, instances where the finding of facts by the trial Court was reversed by the appellate Court:
(a) non-consideration or insufficient or no judicial appreciation of mater
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.