SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 14

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
SYED AHMAD JAMAL – Appellant
Versus
DATO BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background on the artist and sculpture. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. modifications made without consent. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. moral rights related to authorship. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. impact of modifications on artist's reputation. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. expert testimonies on artistic integrity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. court's assessment of modification impact. (Para 18 , 19)
7. interpretation of statutory provisions. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
8. court's orders regarding restoration. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
9. assessment of damages. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
10. final damages assessment and conclusion. (Para 29)
Azahar Mohamed J:

[1] Dato' Syed Ahmad bin Jamal (the plaintiff) is a highly respected and internationally well-known artist. He is the only artist to date who has been recognized by the Malaysian government by the award of the National Laureate for his contribution in the field of art in 1996. He is one of the pioneer artists who has defined the local art scene and set new standards of creativity. He is also the former director of the National Art Gallery. In 1996, he was also conferred the Panglima Jasa Negara for his outstanding contribution in the development of arts and culture o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top