GOPAL SRI RAM, MOKHTAR SIDIN, SITI NORMA YAAKOB
LEMBAGA TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM HOSPITAL BESAR PULAU PINANG – Appellant
Versus
UTRA BADI K PERUMAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of procedural fairness. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. key documents and their significance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. findings from evidence and arguments. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's reasoning and firm grounds for procedural fairness. (Para 11) |
Gopal Sri Ram JCA:
As long ago as March 1991, the respondent was dismissed from the public service. On 6 November 1991 he instituted proceedings for wrongful dismissal. His action was heard and disposed off on 30 May 1996. The learned judge who tried the action held that the respondent had been wrongfully dismissed. He granted the respondent the relief sought by him. The appellants being dissatisfied with the decision appealed to this court. Their appeal was heard and dismissed on 3 May 1999.
The issue in this appeal concerns the right to procedural fairness. It is a constitutional right. It forms one of the cornerstones of our public law jurisprudence. It is an issue which our courts have already dealt with in several cases. See, Kanda v. The Government of Malaya 1962 MarsdenLR 437, Rohana bte Ariffin & Anor v. Universiti Sains Malaysia 1986 MarsdenLR 72; [1989] 1 MLJ 487; Tan Tek Seng V. Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan &
Kanda v. The Government of Malaya
Rohana bte Ariffin & Anor v. Universiti Sains Malaysia
Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v. Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor
Inspector General of Police v. Alan Noor bin Kamat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.