Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
SEE LEONG CHYE @ SZE LEONG CHYE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK BERHAD & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. competing claims over the same land lead to distinct appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts revealing the complexities of land ownership and agreements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. findings regarding the validity of claims based on fraudulent conveyance. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 4. court findings on the implications of fraud in land registration. (Para 16) |
| 5. the principle of deferred indefeasibility upheld in favor of a subsequent purchaser. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. subsequent purchasers enjoy protections under the law when acting in good faith. (Para 23 , 24 , 32 , 36) |
[1] There are two appeals before us arising from two civil actions filed by the respective parties. The two civil actions were heard one after the other in the High Court in view of the fact that they relate to competing claims between the affected parties over the same piece of land ["the Land"].
[2] In the first appeal [Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-5-03-2017(B)] the appellants, See Leong Chye @ Sze Leong Chye and See Ewe Lin ["the See Brothers"] were the plaintiffs in the High Court Civil Suit No: 22-233-2010 ["Suit 233"], while the respondents [United Overseas Bank Berhad ["UOB"] and Heveapla
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
