SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1216

SESSION COURT SHAH ALAM
LIAN THNG KAIH – Appellant
Versus
GOFLEX DESIGN & RENO SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:RV Lingam ,Respondent Advocate: April Tay,Pey Shau Xuan

Table of Content
1. contractual obligations and payments (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
2. defendant's counter-claims and defenses (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. plaintiff's claims and arguments (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
4. defendant's arguments and counterclaims (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
5. court's analysis and findings (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 78 , 79 , 80)
Yong Leou Shin SCJ:

A. Background Facts

[1] The Plaintiff engaged the Defendant M/S Goflex Design & Reno Sdn Bhd (Contractor) to do renovation works in the Plaintiff's house having an address as No 46A, Jalan Merah Mawar U9/6, Kayangan Height, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor.

[2] The Defendant issued a quotation dated 17 October 2018 together with the scope of work that has to be completed by the Defendant where the whole sum for the contract for the renovation of the said house was RM299,050.50.

[3] The Defendant further issued a "Variation Order" dated 7 November 2019 for the sum of RM55,843.60 for the additional work to be done which was disputed by the Plaintiff.

[4] The Plaintiff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top