SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 907

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TEOH HOCK SOON – Appellant
Versus
CHAN PENG YEE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:WH Kan,Jennifer John ,Respondent Advocate: Balwant Singh Sidhu

[1] This is my judgment regarding the originating summons (encl 1) filed by the plaintiff for orders which are summarised as follows:

(i) The guardianship, custody, care and control of the children V, B and E ("the children");

(ii) The plaintiff shall be responsible for the maintenance of the children;

(iii) The defendant whether by herself, agent or worker and/or any party be prohibited, prevented or restrained from removing the children from the jurisdiction of this court or overseas without the consent of this court and without the knowledge of the plaintiff;

(iv) That the children attend counselling sessions with a recognized/ registered counsellor;

(v) The defendant be given supervised access to the children pending the outcome of (para iv) above;

(vi) The identities of the children be protected by the court in the event that a judgment is published;

(vii) Costs in the cause;

(viii) Any other relief deemed fit by the court.

Brief Facts

[2] The plaintiff and the defendant registered a civil marriage on 6 May 1995 but were subsequently divorced on 27 March 1998. The plaintiff contended that the divorce was due to the defendant being involved in an adulterous affair with a third party almo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top