Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ADISWARAN THARUMAPUTRINTAR – Appellant
Versus
PP & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can generate the key points with the appropriate references.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of murder charge (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. eyewitness accounts of the crime scene (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. statements of defense witnesses (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. trial judge's findings on evidence (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. arguments about identity and evidence admissibility (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. court's assessment of testimonial reliability (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
[1] All the four appellants were charged in the High Court at Shah Alam for the offence of murder under s 302 of the Penal Code read together with s 34 of the same Code. They, together with three other persons were alleged to have committed the murder of one Manivanan Vellaysamy (No passport: E2068544) between 9 August 2004 and 10 August 2004 at No 136, Jalan Pandan 1, Pandan Jaya, Ampang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan.
[2] They were found guilty of the offence as charged, convicted and sentenced to death. Their appeals to the Court of Appeal were dismissed and they now appeal to this Court.
[3] For the purpose of this judgment, the appellant in no 05-315-11/2011(B), that is Mainthan Arumugam will be referred to as
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
