Back
Next 
2014 MarsdenLR 715
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PP – Appellant
Versus
ZAINAL ABIDIN MAIDIN & ANOR – Respondent
[Criminal Appeal No: 41LB-202-08-2013]
The court affirmed the acquittal, establishing that the prosecution failed to prove a prima facie case due to contradictions and insufficient evidence.
Headnote:(A) Penal Code - Section 427 - Mischief charge - Respondents acquitted for lack of prima facie case - Evaluation of evidence surrounding vehicular damage and witness credibility was scrutinized. (Paras 1-54)
(B) Prima Facie Case - Definition and criteria for establishing as described under the Criminal Procedure Code and case law noted. (Paras 31-42)
(C) Witness credibility - Crucial contradictions between prosecution witnesses raised, questioning materiality and overall case integrity. (Paras 25-49)
(D)
Findings of Court:
The magistrate's conclusion on contradictions rendered prosecution case insufficient without calling for defendants was upheld. (Paras 52-54) (E)
Issues: Critical examination of evidence delay and contradictions affecting the prosecution's claim of damage liability. (Paras 9-10) (F)
Ratio Decidendi: The court endorsed the magistrate's view that the prosecution's case lacked convincing evidence of a prima facie nature and thus affirmed the acquittal. (Paras 51-54) (G)
Result: Appeal dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the events leading to the charge (Para 1) |
[1] This is an appeal from the Magistrate's Court at Selayang where the respondents were jointly charged with committing mischief under s 427 of the Penal Code . At the end of the prosecution case, the magistrate held that a prima facie case was not made out by the prosecution and acquitted and discharged the respondents without calling for their defence.
