SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1133

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
PANUT PADRI – Appellant
Versus
PADIBERAS NASIONAL BERHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:T A Sivam ,Respondent Advocate: hariffullah Majeed

Table of Content
1. consolidation application based on common facts. (Para 2)

[1] This is an application by the Company to consolidate this case with two other cases that is:

1. Case no: 22/4-808/13 Ahmad Kastalani bin Sumo v. Padiberas Nasional Berhad and

2. Case no: 5/4-809/13 Hassan bin Awang v. Padiberas Nasional Berhad

[2] The ground of the application are stated in the Affidavit in support which among others:

1. The cause of action arose out of a reference under s 20(3) ICA pertaining to the dismissal of the 3 claimants by the same Company. They were dismissed about the same time based on common facts and this relief sought are the same.

2. The disciplinary action that was taken against all the 3 claimants are the result of the same incident where the company discovered the depletion of paddy stock at 10.36% at the company's Kilang Beras Bernas, Sungai Besar, Selangor.

3. The witnesses that gave evidence in the 3 Domestic Inquiry and the panel member who heard the inquiries were the same.

There is an Affidavit in Reply filed by Claimant Ahmad Kastalani bin Sumo objecting the application Claimant Hassan bin Awang has informed the Court that he has no objection that his case be consolid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top