SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 1539

VT SINGHAM
M AMIR NASIR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant's initial conviction details and sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. reevaluation of appeal process due to lack of representation. (Para 5)
JUDGMENT

VT Singham JC:

This was an appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court, Temerloh wherein the appellant was convicted for offences of rape on his stepdaughter on three different occasions. He was convicted and sentenced on 19 July 1995 to 15 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the rotan on the first charge and on the second charge he was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment and ordered to be given 10 strokes of the rotan and both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. On the third charge, the appellant was also sentenced to 15 years imprisonment and ordered to be given 10 strokes of the rotan and the sentence was ordered to run consecutively after the appellant had served the concurrent sentence on the first and second charges. The appellant was not satisfied with the decision of the Sessions Court and hence this appeal.

Charge

The appellant was charged as follows:

Pertuduhan Pertama:

Bahawa kamu antara 29hb.

Oktober, 1994, hingga 30/10/94 lebih kurang jam 11.00 malam, di-Rumah No 454, Felda Chemomo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top