HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
ZAWAHID CHE MAT – Appellant
Versus
KAWASAN PEMBANGUNAN PERTANIAN BERSEPADU BAHAGIAN KERIAN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for discovery in cases without named tortfeasors. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. overview of the plaintiff's claim and land possession. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. legal requirements and objections raised in court process. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. summary of grounds for striking out and tort principles. (Para 19 , 22 , 32) |
| 5. consideration of vicarious liability and continuous tort principles. (Para 27 , 29 , 41) |
[1] An application for striking out for failure to name the actual tortfeasor ought not to succeed if adjectival law in the form of discovery can be pressed into aid to ascertain his identity for purposes of establishing vicarious liability.
Introduction
[2] The Appellant (plaintiff) sued the Respondents (defendants) for trespass claiming that the Respondents in carrying out excavation works for a retention pond adjoining her land, brought onto her land waste materials causing her oil palm trees to be cut down and her land made unsuitable for the planting of oil palm trees.
[3] In the Sessions Court, the Respondents succeeded in their application to have the action struck out summarily pursuant to O 18 r 19(1) (a), (b) and (d) and O 92 r 4 of the Rules
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.