Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT PENANG
MOHD NAJIB JAMALUDIN – Appellant
Versus
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal complaint initiated (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. company's defense on dismissal (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's role in dismissal cases (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. standard of proof required (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. evidence of misconduct (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. investigation procedures (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. validity of domestic inquiry (Para 43 , 44) |
| 8. misconduct established (Para 51 , 52 , 56) |
| 9. condonation of misconduct (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 61 , 62) |
| 10. delay in disciplinary action (Para 72 , 73 , 76 , 80) |
| 11. final order and compensation (Para 90 , 91 , 92 , 99) |
Reference
[1] This is a reference made on 19 November 2020 by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia to the Industrial Court of Malaysia under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ('the Act') arising out of the dismissal of MOHD NAJIB BIN JAMALUDIN ('the Claimant') by TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD ('the Company') on 26 February 2020. The Ministerial reference in this case before the Court requires the Court to hear and determine the Claimant's complaint of dismissal by the Company.
Brief Background Facts Of T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
