SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 1957

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
JUSNINAWATI ABDUL GHANI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Farida Mohammad ,Respondent Advocate: Faizah Mohd Salleh

Table of Content
1. omission of terrorist information. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. the proceedings focused on whether the appellant had a legal duty to disclose terrorist-related information. (Para 2)
3. legal obligations of police personnel. (Para 10)

[1] The appellant was charged and tried at the Kuala Lumpur High Court for an offence of omitting to disclose information pertaining to a terrorist act. The charge read as follows:

"Bahawa kamu, di antara bulan Ogos 2015 sehingga 22 Mac 2016, di Balai Polis Petaling Jaya, di Ibu Pejabat Daerah Petaling Jaya, dalam Daerah Petaling, dalam Negeri Selangor, yang mempunyai sebab untuk mempercayai bahawa suatu perbuatan keganasan iaitu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 130JA Kanun Keseksaan akan dilakukan, meninggalkan dengan sengaja daripada memberi apa-apa maklumat berkenaan dengan kesalahan itu, yang kamu terikat di sisi undang-undang untuk memberi, dan oleh itu kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 130M Kanun yang sama."

[2] After full trial, the High Court found the appellant guilty and sentenced her to seven years' imprisonment, the maximum term allowed by law. The sentence was ordered to run from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top