Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MOHD RIDZWAN ABDUL RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
ASMAH HJ MOHD NOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the case facts surrounding the complaint of sexual harassment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. details of the judicial findings and the procedural history of the case. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. appellant's arguments against the existence of a tort for sexual harassment. (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. respondent's counter-arguments acknowledging the reality of harassment. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. court's observations on establishing the tort of sexual harassment based on provided evidence. (Para 39 , 60 , 61) |
| 6. adjudication on the injury and tort of sexual harassment recognized by the court. (Para 78 , 79) |
| 7. final orders and decisions by the court dismissing the appellant's appeal. (Para 82 , 83) |
[1] The appellant and the respondent were employees of Lembaga Tabung Haji ("the company"). The appellant was the General Manager of the Risk Management Department whilst the respondent held the position of Senior Manager in that department. The respondent being the subordinate of the appellant reported directly to him.
[2] On 29 July 2009, the respondent lodged a complaint ("the complaint") to the Chief Executive Officer of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
