SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 67

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AZMI ARIFFIN, JCA
PERSEPKTIF MASA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SABAH DEVELOPMENT BANK BERHAD – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: B-02(IM)(NCVC)-549-04/2024]



Petitioner Advocates:Hj Kamaruzaman M Arif,Zamani Ibrahim,Sofiah Omar,Siti Nabila Huda Jasmani ,Respondent Advocate: Marianne Loh Suet May,Jay Koh Mui Woon

The court affirmed that a bank's obligation under an unconditional bank guarantee is absolute, requiring payment upon demand without further investigation into the underlying contract.

Headnote:(A) Bank Guarantee Facilities Agreement - Unconditional and on-demand bank guarantees - Plaintiff's application for an interim injunction dismissed - Plaintiff failed to establish a serious issue to be tried and did not disclose all material facts - The Defendant is not bound to investigate claims made under the bank guarantee. (Paras 28, 29, 33, 34, 38, 48)

(B) Principles of Law on Interlocutory Injunction - The court must be satisfied that there is a serious issue to be tried before granting an injunction - The balance of convenience must favor the applicant. (Paras 29, 30)

Facts of the case:
The Plaintiff, a developer, sought to restrain the Defendant from enforcing loan agreements after defaulting on payments. The Defendant had issued bank guarantees to the main contractor for the project. (Paras 1-12)

Findings of Court:
The Plaintiff failed to show any serious issue warranting an injunction, and the Defendant acted within its rights under the bank guarantee agreements. (Paras 28-48)

Issues: Whether the Plaintiff established a serious issue to be tried and whether the Defendant acted unconscionably in releasing the bank guarantees. (Paras 28, 29)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Defendant had no duty to investigate claims made under the bank guarantees, and the Plaintiff's failure to disclose material facts undermined their application for an injunction. (Paras 33, 34, 38)

Result: Appeal dismissed with costs of RM10,000.00.

Table of Content
1. plaintiff is the developer (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. defendant provided credit facilities (Para 6)
3. plaintiff executed documents (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. defendant paid the bank guarantee (Para 13 , 14)
5. plaintiff received letter of demands (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 29 , 30)
6. plaintiff commenced legal proceedings (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
7. plaintiff's contention for injunction (Para 31)
8. court's decision on serious issue (Para 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
9. court's ruling on bank's duty (Para 33)
10. appeal dismissed (Para 48 , 49)
JUDGMENT

Azmi Ariffin JCA:

Introduction

[1] Enclosure 53 dated 1 April 2024 is the Appellant / Plaintiff Notice of Appeal to this Honourable Court against the Shah Alam High Court decision delivered on 26 March 2024 in dismissing the Appellant's injunction application (Enclosure 3) to restrain the Respondent / Defendant from enforcing the loan and security documents against the Appellant following its default, with costs of RM5,000.00 subject to allocator.

[2] For convenience, we will refer the Appellant as the Plaintiff and the Respondent as the Defendant.

Backgrounds Facts

[3] The Plaintiff is the developer of a housing and commercial development project known as Cadangan Membina 5 Blok 38 Tingkat 1,099 Unit Rumah Pangsa Kos Tinggi dan 23 Unit Kedai 4 Tingkat yang Mengandungi Kemudahan Tadika, Dewan Serbaguna, Surau Serta 4 Tingkat Podium Tempat Letak Kereta dan Rekreasi Dengan 1 Tingkat Basemen di atas Lot 3901 HS(D) 61423, Jalan Aman Fasa III (KG Berembang), Mukim Ulu Klang, Daerah Gombak, Selangor Darul Ehsan) ("the Project").

[4] The Defendant provided credit facilities for the Plaintiff's development projects including the Project, Kemensah Townhouse Project and the Pangsapuri Berembang Indah Project.

[5] By way of a Letter of Award dated 31 December 2013, the Plaintiff appointed China Railway Engineering Corporation (M) Sdn Bhd and Bismark Construction & Engineering Sdn Bhd as the main contractor for the Project for a sum of RM1,062,500,000.00 (Ringgit Malaysia One Billion Sixty-Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Only).

[6] The Defendant provided the following credit facilities to the Plaintiff's development projects:

(a) RM30,000,000.00 (Ringgit Malaysia Thirty Million Only) Credit Facilities dated 16 January 2007 to part finance the preliminary expenses, earth works and show houses pertaining to Kemensah Mixed Development project comprising of 72 unit of 2-storey townhouses and 91 units of 3 and a half-storey Superlink Terraced Houses on land identified as Lots PT 2499 - PT 2631, Mukim Hulu Kelang, Daerah Gombak.

(b) RM125,000,000.00 (Ringgit Malaysia One Hundred and Twenty- Five Million Only) Credit Facilities dated 15 June 2007 to finance the payment to Permodalan Negeri Selangor Berhad comprising of land compensation in respect of the joint development on the land known as Perumahan Jalan Aman Fasa III (Kg. Berembang) Mukim Hulu Klang, District of Gombak, to part finance the preliminary expenses, pre-development cost, earth works and the low-cost housing construction pertaining to the Project and to part finance the Plaintiff's development and construction of the Festa Condominium and balance RM35,000,000.00 for the payment of interest in arrears of the RM125,000,000.00 Credit Facilities;

(c) RM104,100,000.00 (Ringgit Malaysia One Hundred and Four Million One Hundred Thousand Only) Term Loan Facility dated 10 December 2018 to be utilised to settle interest, fees, penalties and other charges (including legal fees, costs and charges) outstanding or due and payable for credit facilities ie, RM30,000,000.00 Credit Facilities, RM125,000,000.00 Credit Facilities, RM476,000,000.00 Bank Guarantee Facilities, RM476,000,000.00 Term Loan Facility and RM235,000,000.00 Term Loan Facility; and

(d) RM235,000,000.00 (Ringgit Malaysia Two Hundred and Thirty- Five Term Loan Facility dated 6 August 2020 to fully settle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top