COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ BAHADUR SUNAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. murder charge and evidence summary. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
[1] The respondent was charged in the High COURT at Shah Alam for the murder of one Indra Rani a/p Munusamy (KPT: 590220-10-5000), an offence punishable under s 302 of the Penal Code .
[2] The prosecution's case is as follows The respondent was a caretaker of an orchard owned by Wong Yee Woh (SP13). The respondent was employed to take care of SP13's weekend house located on the orchard as well as the orchard. On the day stated in the charge, the deceased who was a helper on the neighbouring chicken farm, was found by her co-worker SP5, with her throat slit.
[3] SP13 had received complaints from the deceased that the respondent had been harassing her; that the respondent has often climbed over the wall separating the two farms and had often contacted the deceased who was staying in a shed on the neighbouring farm; that the respondent had also borrowed money from the deceased and had refused to pay back, which had given rise to arguments between the respondent and the deceased.
[4] Upon arrest, the respondent had led the police to the kitchen of the house where he was working. As a result of the information
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.