FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. definition and appealability of trial decisions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. grounds for needing comprehensive judgment reasons. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. importance of adequate reasoning in judgments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. concern for clarity in judicial decisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. interlocutory rulings and jurisdiction limitations. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. definition of 'decision' under cja. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. procedural precedent regarding appealability. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. legislative intent to prevent trial delays. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 9. conclusion on ruling's appealability. (Para 26) |
Introduction
[1] This appeal relates to the ruling made by the trial Judge in the ongoing criminal trial in the High Court at Kuala Lumpur, bearing No 45 September 2009, where the appellant is facing a charge under s 377B of the Penal Code . The ruling arose from the application by the learned counsel for the appellant for the statement of the Complainant (PW 1), recorded under s 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code (112 statement), to be produced for examination by the appellant. Learned trial judge dismissed the application and the reasons for his decision are found in his judgment dated 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.