HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ROSLI DAHLAN – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent
[1] This is an application by the applicant for leave to institute judicial review proceedings against the abovenamed respondents under O 53 of the Rules of the High 1980 (RHC). The orders sought by the applicant are as follows:
(i) an order for certiorari to quash the letter dated 14 September 2007 issued by En Anthony Kevin Morais (the DPP) and received by the applicant on 17 September 2007, in refusing to disclose the facts and particulars forming the basis upon which the applicant was purportedly identified as an associate of one Ramli bin Yusuff;
(ii) an order for certiorari to quash the two notices dated 17 July 2007 and 16 August 2007 (s 32(1)(b) notices) issued by the DPP under s 32(1)(b) of the Anti-Corruption Act 1997 (the said Act).
(iii) a declaration that the s 32(1)(b) notices are defective, invalid, unlawful and subsequently null and void and of no effect;
(iv) an order that the s 32(1)(b) notices be set aside;
(v) an order for mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to provide the facts and particulars forming the basis upon which the applicant was purportedly identified as an associate of Ramli bin Yusuff;
(vi) damages.
[2] The applicant is also seek
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.