COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TAI MAY CHEAN – Appellant
Versus
UNITED EASTERN RESOURCES SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
[1] The mother and daughter have against each other some pending suits before the courts since February 2013. The mother of all suits between them must surely be the one where the daughter is praying for a committee to be appointed to manage her mother's affairs on ground of her supposed mental disability or incapacity under the Mental Health Act 2001. This Mental Health action would have a domino-effect on the other pending contentious suits if the outcome is in favour of the daughter.
[2] They are both at different rounds of their legal battles that have now reached the Court of Appeal and this present one is now at the leave application stage before the Federal Court.
[3] This is an action launched on 25 June 2019 by the daughter against the company United Eastern Resources Sdn Bhd ("the Company") and the mother, seeking leave of the High Court to bring an action in the name of the Company against another company named TYY Resources Sdn Bhd ("TYYR"), the vendor, that had received full purchase price of a property from the Company but had refused to transfer the property to the Company.
[4] It is an action under ss 345, 347 and 348 of the Companies Act 201
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.