RANJAN PARAMALINGAM & ANOR vs PERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN BANGSAR KUALA LUMPUR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 491

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
RANJAN PARAMALINGAM & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN BANGSAR KUALA LUMPUR – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Bastian Vendargon,Anne Vendargon ,Respondent Advocate: Ameerul Aizat Noor Haslan,Muhd Nur Aiman Toharudin

Table of Content
1. background and claim overview. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. lhcj's decision on legality and proof of nuisance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments and claims presented in the appeal. (Para 12 , 19)
4. legal principles governing appeals and findings. (Para 13 , 14 , 28 , 30 , 31)

Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali JCA:

Introduction

[1] This appeal emanated from the decision of the learned High Court Judge (LHCJ) at Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissing the appellants'/the plaintiffs' claim against the respondent/the defendant premised on the tort of nuisance, both public and private, and for breach of personal data law. The relief sought by the appellants/the plaintiffs are inter alia for declarations, injunctions, specific orders and damages.

[2] For ease of reference, parties will be identified as in the trial Court, the plaintiffs and the defendant.

Brief Background Facts

[3] The 1st plaintiff is a registered proprietor of a house at No 73 Jalan Limau Manis, Bangsar Park, Kuala Lumpur (the said Property). The 2nd plaintiff is the tenant of the said Property. The defendant is a Resident Association registered under Society Act 1966 who managed the Guarded Neighbourhood (GN) scheme and re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 491

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYARANJAN PARAMALINGAM & ANOR – AppellantVersusPERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN BANGSAR KUALA LUMPUR – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
RANJAN PARAMALINGAM & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN BANGSAR KUALA LUMPUR – Respondent