SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 358

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KALAICHELVAN SINGARAVELU – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Saseedharan Menon,Atma Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Mohamed Mustafa P Kunyalam

Table of Content
1. charges of corruption under anti-corruption act (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. overview of prosecution and defense witness testimonies (Para 6 , 7)
3. appellant's grounds of appeal regarding witness credibility (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. court's reasoning on appeal issues and evidence admissibility (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
Su Geok Yiam J:

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the convictions and sentences which were handed down on him by the learned Shah Alam Sessions Court Judge (the "trial judge") on 29 July 2008.

Facts And Background

[2] The appellant, a police sergeant in the Royal Malaysian Police Force at the material time, was charged with 2 counts of corruption under the Anti-Corruption Act 1997 (Act 575) (the "Act").

The 2 Charges

[3] The 1st charge alleged that he had on 11 January 2003 at about 2.30pm in the compound of the Kuala Kubu Baru Police Station, in the Hulu Selangor District, as an agent of the Malaysian Government, to wit, a police sergeant of the Royal Malaysian Police, corruptly solicited for himself cash of RM2000.00 from Subramaniam s/o Mogan as an inducement to release the son of Subramaniam, namely, Prakash s/o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top