SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 575

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HASSAN NAWALI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. assessment of defense and standards of proof. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. presentation and evaluation of evidence by prosecution. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
3. challenges associated with the prosecution's evidentiary burden in establishing drug trafficking. (Para 6)
4. role of medical evidence in establishing incapacity. (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
5. criteria for establishing prima facie cases. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

[1] The appellant's appeal on conviction and sentence in relation to a charge under s 39B(1)(a) came up for hearing on 26 September 2017. We allowed the appeal principally on the ground that the learned trial judge had failed to give due weight and consideration to the defence story.

[2] In the instant case, the appellant's evidence of his incapacity on medical grounds to discredit prosecution's sole witness evidence was not debunked by the prosecution at the prosecution stage and/or at the defence stage, thereby making the conviction and sentence unsafe. In addition, the prosecution evidence through PW2 as well as chemist evidence to link the accused was in our view, weak evidence to establish a prima facie case more so when the arrest was as a result of prior information by an infor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top