SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 533

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
IMEJ WARISAN SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. parties to contract dispute (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. claims for damages and interest (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's contract interpretation principles (Para 12 , 30 , 31)
4. arguments for and against claims (Para 13 , 14 , 18 , 22)
Vernon Ong JCA:

Introduction

[1] Pursuant to a design and build contract entered into between Imej Warisan Sdn Bhd (the plaintiff in the court below) and the Government of Malaysia (the defendant in the court below), the plaintiff sued the defendant for (i) late payment interest of RM1,511,386.84; (ii) damages in the sum of RM685,225.71 for wrongful deduction of liquidated ascertained damages ('LAD') of 27 days; and damages of RM3,420,320.96 for loss and expense suffered by the plaintiff in respect of the delay in the completion of the project.

[2] After a full trial at the Kota Kinabalu High court, the learned judge allowed the plaintiff's claim and made the following orders, inter alia:

a) The defendant to pay the plaintiff late payment interest of RM1,021,932.18 together with interest at 4% per annum from date of judgment until realisation;

b) The defendant is entitled to impose LAD of 24 days only amounting to RM609,089.52 and not RM685,225.71 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top