TROPICAL NETWORK SDN BHD vs GEO-CHEM INSPECTION (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; FIMA BULKING SERVICES BHD (THIRD....

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:R Jayabalan,N Jegathesan ,Respondent Advocate: Oon Thian Seng

Table of Content
1. introduction of the facts surrounding the consignment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of the contamination's cause. (Para 4 , 5)
3. plaintiff's claims and losses detailed. (Para 6 , 7)
4. defendant's defense against contamination allegations. (Para 8 , 9)
5. legal grounds of the plaintiff's claim: breach and negligence. (Para 10 , 11)
6. implied terms derived from contractual agreements. (Para 12 , 13)
7. agreed issues for trial regarding duty of care. (Para 15 , 16)
8. mpob rules and their application in the case. (Para 17 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 28 , 29)
9. examination of the attending surveyor's responsibilities. (Para 30 , 31 , 34 , 41 , 42 , 47 , 49)
10. witness credibility challenges and evidence admissibility. (Para 52 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 61)
11. understanding heating and solidification of lorol cargo. (Para 66 , 74)
12. defendant's assumptions and the duty of the surveyor. (Para 77 , 79 , 80 , 81)
13. apportioning liability between defendant and third party. (Para 83 , 84 , 85)
14. final decision on liability and damages assessment. (Para 86 , 87)

Supang Lian JC:

Introduction

[1] Tropical Network Sdn Bhd (plaintiff) had a consignment of 800.39 MT of Lorol C12-14MY, a liquid alcohol d