Petitioner Advocates:Edward Saw Keat Leong,Jerry Low Kok Kiang ,Respondent Advocate: Andrew Heng Yeng Hoe,Roger Leong Chun Lim

The grounds of appeal are based on the assertion that the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the duty of care owed by the defendants. Specifically, the appeal contends that the court failed to recognize that the duty of care extended beyond contractual obligations, arising instead from the nature of the relationship, conduct, and professional standards. The appeal also challenges the court’s conclusion that statutory provisions do not automatically create a tort of breach of statutory duty, arguing that the legislative intent should have been interpreted more broadly to impose liability where appropriate. Furthermore, the appeal asserts that the lower court did not adequately consider the evidence demonstrating the defendants’ negligent conduct in supervising the project, advising on costs, and ensuring timely completion, which are critical factors establishing breach of duty. The appellant contends that these oversights led to an incorrect determination of liability and damages, and thus, the decision should be reconsidered.