ANNE ADELINE ANTHONY RAJU vs SERI ANGGUN CONDOMINIUM JMB

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1703

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
ANNE ADELINE ANTHONY RAJU – Appellant
Versus
SERI ANGGUN CONDOMINIUM JMB – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Francis Pereira ,Respondent Advocate: Sreedhara Naidu

Table of Content
1. reference under industrial relations act (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. claimant's employment details and dismissal (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
3. jmb's arguments on termination (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
4. court's function under s 20(3) (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. issues to be determined (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
6. court's findings on dismissal (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
7. termination without just cause (Para 46 , 47)
8. remedy and compensation (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
9. court's award to the claimant (Para 55)

Paramalingam J Doraisamy:

Reference

[1] This is a reference made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177), arising out of the dismissal of Anne Adeline a/p Anthony Raju (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by Seri Anggun Condominium JMB (hereinafter referred to as "the JMB") on 26 September 2021.

[2] The reference by the Director General of Industrial Relations in this case required the Court to hear and determine the Claimant's complaint of dismissal by the JMB on 26 September 2021.

I. Procedural History

[3] The Court received the letter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1703

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPURANNE ADELINE ANTHONY RAJU – AppellantVersusSERI ANGGUN CONDOMINIUM JMB – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
ANNE ADELINE ANTHONY RAJU – Appellant
Versus
SERI ANGGUN CONDOMINIUM JMB – Respondent