Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
PUA KOK CHUAN – Appellant
Versus
MODULAR CONSTRUCTIONS TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of dismissal without just cause. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claimants argue retrenchment was in bad faith. (Para 7 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's duty to assess dismissal justification. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court findings on redundancy and justification. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. legal principles regarding bona fide retrenchment. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
Reference
[1] These are references made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("Act") arising out of the dismissal of Pua Kok Chuan, AG Hamzah bin Karim, Norhana binti Azis, Ong Yen Seng, Syed Aliff Asraf bin Syed Abas, Wan Mohd Tajul Arif bin Wan Hamad, Mohd Najmuddin bin Jamal, Low Tack Huat and Syed Sairul Putra bin Syed Salim ("Claimants") by Modular Constructions Technology Sdn Bhd and Lakefront Residence Sdn Bhd ("Company") on the 7 January 2021, 17 March 2021, 30 April 2021 and 4 August 2021.
[2] The references in these cases required the Court to hear and determine the Claimants' complaint of dismissal by the Company on 17 August 2020, 18 August 2020, 19 August 2020, 24 September 2020, 29 September 2020 and 26 January 2021 respectively.
[3] This C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
