Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
HONDAAFUSHI INVESTMENTS PVT LTD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
EXPORT IMPORT BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of applications and decisions (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of the case (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. plaintiffs' arguments in the maldives suit (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's consideration of the striking out application (Para 24 , 25) |
| 5. submission to jurisdiction of maldives court (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. collateral purpose of malaysian suit (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 7. multiplicity of proceedings (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 8. court's analysis on anti-suit injunction (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
Introduction
[1] This judgment deals with 2 applications. The first is the application under encl 3 ("the Anti-Suit Injunction Application") filed by the Plaintiffs for an anti-suit injunction to restrain the prosecution of the action filed by the Defendant against the Plaintiffs in the Republic of Maldives that was commenced in 2019 ("the Maldives Suit"). The second is the application under encl 14 ("the Striking Out Application") filed by the Defendan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
