FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
PEMBINAAN SPK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CONAIRE ENGINEERING SDN BHD-LLC & ANOR AND ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validation of foreign judgment enforcement. (Para 1 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. understanding parties and procedural obligations. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 3. proof requirements for enforceability. (Para 12 , 22 , 32) |
| 4. outcomes of appeals. (Para 34) |
[1] This was a common law action for the enforcement of a foreign judgment. This course of action was necessitated by the fact that the judgment, a judgment entered in default, emanated from the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance, and the United Arab Emirates is not a reciprocating country listed under the First Schedule to the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act 1958 [REJA]. The claim was allowed at the High Court and the decision was affirmed on appeal although the Court of Appeal did vary the award on the interest rate, that it was to run from the date of the judgment in Abu Dhabi instead of from the date of decision at the High Court.
[2] On 5 October 2021, leave was granted on the following questions of law:
i. Whether a foreign judgment is enforceable by a common law action in Malaysia (the foreign country not being a First Schedule country under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Foreign Judgment Act 1958 ("REJA")
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.