SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 364

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
LAI FEE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
WONG YU VEE & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Andrew Chiew Ean Vooi,Nicola Tang Zhan Ying ,Respondent Advocate: Maurice Ernest Scully,Tan Wee Jiun

Table of Content
1. fraudulent trading leads to personal liability for directors. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court examined the evidence for fraudulent trading. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
3. arguments address the applicability of fraudulent intent. (Para 16 , 20)
4. directors cannot evade liability under section 540. (Para 35 , 37)
5. appeal affirmed the principle of directors' personal liability. (Para 68 , 69)
Vernon Ong Lam Kiat FCJ:

Introduction

[1] This appeal relates to a suit filed in the High Court ('s 540 Suit') against three individuals for fraudulent trading pursuant to s 540 of the Companies Act 2016 ( CA 2016). The three individuals (defendants) were shareholders cum directors of a company. The company had entered into an agreement with the plaintiffs to purchase all of the plaintiffs' shares in a partnership firm, and having taken over the partnership firm, failed to pay the balance purchase price. The plaintiffs sued and obtained judgment against the company for the balance purchase price. However, the company did not satisfy the judgment debt.

[2] The plaintiffs wanted to make the defendants personally responsible for the unpaid balance purchase price on the ground that the business of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top