FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
LAI FEE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
WONG YU VEE & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fraudulent trading leads to personal liability for directors. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court examined the evidence for fraudulent trading. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. arguments address the applicability of fraudulent intent. (Para 16 , 20) |
| 4. directors cannot evade liability under section 540. (Para 35 , 37) |
| 5. appeal affirmed the principle of directors' personal liability. (Para 68 , 69) |
Introduction
[1] This appeal relates to a suit filed in the High Court ('s 540 Suit') against three individuals for fraudulent trading pursuant to s 540 of the Companies Act 2016 ( CA 2016). The three individuals (defendants) were shareholders cum directors of a company. The company had entered into an agreement with the plaintiffs to purchase all of the plaintiffs' shares in a partnership firm, and having taken over the partnership firm, failed to pay the balance purchase price. The plaintiffs sued and obtained judgment against the company for the balance purchase price. However, the company did not satisfy the judgment debt.
[2] The plaintiffs wanted to make the defendants personally responsible for the unpaid balance purchase price on the ground that the business of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.