SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1991

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
EWE KHAY GUAN – Appellant
Versus
CHIN OI KHIUN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:,Respondent Advocate:

Table of Content
1. introduction of the appeal and court's decision timeline. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the application for document discovery. (Para 3 , 4)
3. background facts of the marriage and issues. (Para 5)
4. relevance of the documents in assessing financial capacity. (Para 6 , 7 , 9)
5. necessity of documents for fair proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
6. petitioner's objections to the discovery application. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. irrelevance of requested documents to the case. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
8. arguments against the necessity of financial documents. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
9. further objections to the relevance of requested documents. (Para 39 , 41 , 42 , 43)
10. court's analysis of the discovery application. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
11. importance of financial documents in divorce proceedings. (Para 58 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)
12. legal framework governing discovery in malaysia. (Para 66 , 67 , 68)
13. court's final decision on the discovery application. (Para 69)
Azizan Md Arshad JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of this court in allowing an application (Encl 15) by Chin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top