SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 946

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
CIMB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
SIVADEVI SIVALINGAM – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Jeyanthini Kannaperan,Aarthi Jeyarajah,Pauline Koh ,Respondent Advocate: KS Pang,CK Yap

[1] We heard the appeal and reserved our decision. This decision is made and delivered pursuant to s 78(1) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, as Justice Ramly Ali FCJ and Justice Alizatul Khair Osman Khairuddin FCJ have since retired. This decision is therefore the decision of the remaining members of the panel. The decision is that the appeal is allowed with costs. The decision of the Court of Appeal is set aside. The order of the High Court is reinstated.

[2] I have prepared a judgment containing reasons for the aforesaid decision. Justice Rohana Yusuf FCJ has written a separate judgment giving different reasons for the aforesaid decision. Justice Mohd Zawawi Salleh FCJ agreed with the judgment of Justice Rohana Yusuf.

[3] The following is my judgment.

[4] In this judgment, the parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court.

[5] This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the decision of the Court of Appeal which had, on 6 March 2018, allowed the defendant's appeal against the order for sale in respect of the land held under Hakmilik Geran 308417, Lot 47137, Mukim Tebrau, Daerah Johor Bahru, Johor ("the said Land").

[6] The background facts leading to the present appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top