Table of Content
1. primary appeals concern interlocutory injunctions in franchise disputes. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. the dispute revolves around competition clauses in a terminated franchise agreement. (Para 2)
3. the case is centered around a terminated franchise agreement and pending arbitration. (Para 3 , 7 , 8)
4. the court assesses the interplay between injunctions and franchise termination. (Para 4)
5. the appeal discusses grounds for injunctions based on contractual obligations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. discussion of judicial discretion in granting injunctions related to business competition. (Para 13 , 14)
7. the court favors prohibitory injunctions to prevent unfair competition. (Para 20)

[4] The learned Judicial Commissioner only allowed the mandatory orders (return of properties) and did not grant the prohibitory orders (restraint of trade). In consequence, La Kaffa is only appealing against part of the said judgment.

Appeal '1275'

[5] The appellant here is Loob who had filed an Origination Summons No. WA-24IP-6-03/2017 to restrain La Kaffa from interfering with their 'TEALIVE' business.

[6] In essence, if La Kaffa succeeds in the appeal, Loob's appeal must be dismissed.

Brief Facts

[7] Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document