Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ADAM PRIMUS VARGHESE ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
KHEE SAN FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for remuneration of interim judicial manager (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. defendant's argument for conversion to writ action based on factual disputes (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's analysis of witness testimony necessity (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. cross-examination sufficiency under order 38 (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. criteria governing remuneration assessment (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. justification of composite hourly rate (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. inclusion of pre-appointment and post-termination work in claim (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 8. assessment of company's financial performance during management (Para 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 96) |
| 9. documentary evidence supporting third-party interactions (Para 98 , 99 , 100) |
| 10. approval of remuneration without taxation-like process (Para 109 , 110 , 111 , 112) |
[1] Before the court is an application to convert an originating summons seeking remuneration of a former Interim Judicial Manager to a writ action. The former Interim Judicial Manager claims remuneration of approximately RM2.00 million for work done over a 10-month pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
