HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
INHOME GROUP SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DREAM HOME STRUCTURAL WORKS SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: WA-22IP-44-08/2023]
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of cases in the judgment. (Para 1) |
| 2. summary of key facts in breach of contract cases. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 12 , 21) |
| 3. legal principles of breach of confidence. (Para 11 , 13 , 15 , 18 , 25 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. findings regarding copyright infringement. (Para 31 , 39 , 41 , 42) |
| 5. elements of unlawful interference with trade. (Para 49) |
| 6. basis for passing off claims. (Para 53 , 54) |
| 7. criteria for trademark invalidation. (Para 68 , 72 , 80 , 81) |
| 8. claims about profit sharing. (Para 99 , 103) |
| 9. summary of court findings. (Para 108 , 109) |
A. Introduction
[1] This is the court's judgment after the full trial of:
(i) the action by Inhome Group Sdn Bhd ("Inhome"):
(a) against Kuan Kok Han ("Kuan") for breach of contract, breach of duty of fidelity and breach of confidence;
(b) against Dream Home Structural Works Sdn Bhd ("Dream Home") and Kuan for copyright infringement; and
(c) against Dream Home and Kuan for unlawful interference with trade; and
(ii) the action by counterclaim by Dream Home against Inhome, Mr Awning Sdn Bhd ("Mr Awning") and Chong Chan Yip ("Chong") for passing off;
(iii) the action by counterclaim by Dream Home against Inhome, Mr Awning and Chong for unlawful interference with trade;
(iv) the action by counterclaim by Dream Home against, Mr Awning for invalidation of Trademark No: TM2023029030 registered on 26 September 2023;
(v) the action by counterclaim by Kuan against Inhome for:
(a) 1% of Inhome's monthly revenue from its branches in Johor Bahru, Penang, Ipoh, Melaka, Seremban and Batu Pahat for the period of January 2020 to December 2022; and
(b) 10% of Inhome's annual net profit from 2017 - 2022.
B. Inhome v. Kuan, For Breach Of Contract, Breach Of Duty Of Fidelity And Breach Of Confidence
[2] I have decided to deal with these three claims together because of the overlaps in the factual allegations that found them.
Salient Facts
[3] Since its incorporation in 17 November 2024, Inhome has over the years become progressively engaged in the business of the design, manufacture, sale and installation of awnings for residential and commercial properties.
[4] Kuan had been employed by Inhome as a Sales and Marketing Manager from 1 December 2015 - 15 December 2022, and had during the course of his employment with Inhome purchased a 1% shareholding in Inhome.
[5] Kuan's Letter of Employment dated 1 December 2015 ("Employment Contract") and a Non-Disclosure Agreement dated 22 March 2021 that he signed ("NDA") bound him to loyalty and confidentiality to Inhome. The Employment Contract expressly provided, inter alia:
"GENERAL CONDUCT
You are expected to perform your duties assigned to you in a loyal, efficient, trustworthy and honest manner. You are not in any way to indulge yourself in conflict of interest for the company either inside or outside of the company."
[6] The NDA expressly provided, inter alia:
"2.1 The Employee agrees to only use the Confidential Information and to use it only for the purpose of discharging its duties, employment duties and/or performing of its services to the Company and/or on behalf of the Company ("Services"). The Employee agrees not to disclose such Confidential Information to any third parties unless directed to do so by the Company, and with the Company's prior written consent. The Employee agrees not to use the Confidential Information in whole or in part for the personal benefit of the Employee or other establishment other than for the Company. The Employee shall not, nor shall its agents, affiliates or employees, directly use, disclose or disseminate any Confidential Information disclosed to any person or organization other than the Company.
2.2 The Employee shall strictly maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information and shall not disclose, reveal, divulge, furnish, or make accessible of the said Confidential Information to any third party, or use for any unauthorised purpose without the Company's prior written consent.
2.3 The Employee shal


Worldwide Rota Dies Sdn Bhd v. Ronald Ong Cheow Joon
Schmidt Scientific Sdn Bhd v. Ong Han Suan & Ors
Zaharen Haji Zakaria v. Redmax Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals
H & R Johnson (Malaysia) Bhd v. H & R Johnson Tiles Limited & Anor
Elster Metering Limited & Anor v. Damini Corporation Sdn Bhd & Anor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.