Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SPPT DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
WORLDWIDE PLANTATION SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to appeal context (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. background of chenderong concession and wakaf (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. lease agreements and their implications (Para 21 , 22 , 29 , 35 , 39 , 42) |
| 4. parties' arguments on spa validity (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 5. legal framework of wakaf and trustee rights (Para 56 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 6. nature of rights in spa and enforceability (Para 72 , 73 , 81 , 82) |
| 7. obligations and illegalities under spa (Para 84 , 86 , 92) |
| 8. jurisdiction and authority in contracts (Para 93 , 94 , 96) |
| 9. judicial findings supporting res judicata (Para 101 , 105 , 114 , 119) |
| 10. final ruling and costs (Para 120) |
A. Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant, SPPT Development Sdn Bhd, against the decision of the Kuala Lumpur High Court ("KL High Court") in dismissing its action against the Respondent, Worldwide Plantation Sdn Bhd, in Civil Suit No: WA-22NCVC-293-06/2017 ("Suit 293").
[2] The Appellant is the sub-lessee of the Lands forming part of the Chenderong Concession located in the state of Terengganu Darul Iman, under the Principal Sub-Lease Agreeme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
