FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
THE NEW STRAITS TIMES PRESS (MALAYSIA) BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
AIDEAH COMMUNICATION SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. origin of the appeal and parties involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. background facts related to agreements and obligations. (Para 8 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. plaintiff's contention regarding obligations under the agreements. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. summary of findings on appeal. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. court's analysis of contract interpretation. (Para 32 , 37 , 39) |
| 6. burden of proof in claims of reasonable endeavours. (Para 56 , 97 , 126) |
| 7. final judgment and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 149) |
A. Introduction
[1] This matter came up before us on 15 January 2025. We heard oral submissions from learned counsel representing the respective parties. At the conclusion of those submissions, we were unable to render a decision on that day. Therefore, we informed learned counsel that additional time was needed to consider the respective submissions and that they would be notified once a decision had been reached regarding this appeal. We have made our decision and here are the reasons for our judgment. In this judgment, parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court.
[2] The present appeal arose from the Court of Appeal's decision allowing t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.