Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PESTECH TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
SYARIKAT PEMBENAAN YEOH TIONG LAY SDN BHD (ENCLS 1 3 & 42) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for erinford injunction details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for and against the injunction (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on the case proceedings (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal basis for granting injunctions (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's reasoning against granting injunction (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final ruling and directive for appeal (Para 15 , 16) |
(Enclosure 42)
[1] In the matter before me, the Plaintiffs herein being Pestech Sdn Bhd ("P1") and Pestech International Bhd ("P2") ("Plaintiffs") have applied to this Court via encl 42 (encl 42) for an Erinford injunction to restrain the Defendant, either personally and/or through its agents and/or servants, be restrained from initiating, continuing, maintaining, or taking any further action in the arbitration proceedings initiated through the Notice of Commencement of Arbitration Proceedings dated 18 October 2023 until final and complete disposal of the Plaintiff's Appeal on the dismissal of encl 3.
Brief Background Facts
[2] On 7 December 2024, the Plaintiffs' filed an application for an "Anti- Arbitration Injunction" ("AAI") in encl 3 primarily to injunct any further steps from being taken
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
