Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SARALEANE NATTAYA AZMI – Appellant
Versus
TECHNA-X BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim structure and basic factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. defendant's introduction and reasoning for the investment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. evidence of payments and plaintiff's acknowledgment. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. plaintiff's claims of forgery and lack of evidence. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. evidentiary burden regarding acknowledgment of payment. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. arguments around variations of the spa validity. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. finality of acknowledgment and rejection of claims. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 8. refutation of defendant's other claims and legal principles on unconscionability. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
Introduction
[1] This is a judgment delivered after a full trial.
[2] The Plaintiff's claim was for the sum of RM10,452,000.00 being the balance purchase consideration in respect of the sale of her 10,000,000 shares of one Mbits Digital Sdn Bhd to the Defendant. There were some variations to the terms of the agreement, particularly in relation to the payment terms What was initially a straightforward payment had morphed into payments by or through ot
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
