Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
AFFIN BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
LION GOLD ENTERTAINMENT SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 2. plaintiff's and defendants' arguments. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 3. legal standards for summary judgment. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. court's rejection of defendants' claims of misunderstanding. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 5. validity of the guarantee agreement. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 6. observations on procedural issues and defendant's omissions. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 7. court's decision and final order. (Para 58) |
Introduction
[1] This is a case where the Plaintiff bank commenced proceedings against the Defendants, claiming a total outstanding sum of RM5,222,509.10 being an amount due and owing as at 4 October 2024.
[2] Pursuant to the filing of their statement of defence, the Plaintiff had thereafter filed an application in encl 8 dated 14 December 2024 seeking summary judgment to be recorded against the Defendants pursuant to O 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("hereinafter referred to as " ROC 2012") for a sum of RM5,222,509.10 and interest
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
