Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ALLINON ADVANCE TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TETUAN KAMARUDIN & PARTNERS & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's discovery application introduction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual timeline of claim and discovery requests. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments presented by both plaintiff and defendant. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. legal standards and tests for discovery applications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. importance of timely application and implications of delay. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
(Discovery Application/Enclosure 68)
Introduction
[1] This is the Plaintiff's application for discovery dated 22 March 2024 (encl 68) against the 5th Defendant (D5), pursuant to O 24 r 3 of the Rules of Court, 2012 ( ROC 2012) and/or O 24 r 7 of 2012 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of this Court.
[2] This Court dismissed encl 68, the reasons as deliberated.
Brief Facts
[3] The Plaintiff filed their Statement of Claim on 10 February 2022 and on 22 February 2022, amended and filed Amended Statement of Claim. Thereafter, on 29 April 2022, the Plaintiff again amended and filed their Re-Amended Statement of Claim. D5 filed and served their Defence on the Plaintiff's solicitors on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
