SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 2863

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ALLINON ADVANCE TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TETUAN KAMARUDIN & PARTNERS & ORS – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: WA-22NCVC-88-02/2022]



A discovery application must meet the criteria of relevance and necessity to be granted; overly broad requests are considered fishing expeditions and are not permissible.

Headnote:(A) Rules of Court, 2012 - Order 24 - Discovery Application - Plaintiff's request for discovery dated 22 March 2024 dismissed on grounds of overbroad scope, irrelevance, and lack of necessity for fair trial - The court found that the test for discovery necessitates specific, necessary documents and cannot serve as a broad tool to uncover evidence. (Paras 20-25)

(B) Delay in Application - The plaintiff failed to explain the delay in filing the discovery application, which undermined the necessity of the request. (Paras 35-40)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff filed a series of amended claims against the 5th Defendant regarding payments made for nitrile gloves to a company that had been wound up, seeking discovery of documents related to an account. (Paras 3-9)

Findings of Court:
The application for discovery was found to be overly broad and not necessary for fair disposal, leading to its dismissal. (Paras 30-40)

Issues: Key issues include the relevance and necessity of the documents sought for fair trial purposes, and the impact of the plaintiff's delay in filing the application.

Ratio Decidendi: The court stated that documents requested must be clearly identified and relevant for the case, emphasizing that the discovery process should not permit 'fishing expeditions'. (Paras 24-25)

Result: Discovery application dismissed with costs.

Table of Content
1. plaintiff's discovery application introduction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual timeline of claim and discovery requests. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10)
3. arguments presented by both plaintiff and defendant. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. legal standards and tests for discovery applications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
5. importance of timely application and implications of delay. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
Suzana Muhamad Said JC:

(Discovery Application/Enclosure 68)

Introduction

[1] This is the Plaintiff's application for discovery dated 22 March 2024 (encl 68) against the 5th Defendant (D5), pursuant to O 24 r 3 of the Rules of Court, 2012 ( ROC 2012) and/or O 24 r 7 of 2012 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of this Court.

[2] This Court dismissed encl 68, the reasons as deliberated.

Brief Facts

[3] The Plaintiff filed their Statement of Claim on 10 February 2022 and on 22 February 2022, amended and filed Amended Statement of Claim. Thereafter, on 29 April 2022, the Plaintiff again amended and filed their Re-Amended Statement of Claim. D5 filed and served their Defence on the Plaintiff's solicitors on 29 March 2022.

[4] Due to the Plaintiff's Re-Amended Statement of Claim, D5 had subsequently amended and filed their Amended Defence on 20 May 2022.

[5] There were 11 pre-trial case managements on 14 November 2022, 9 January 2023, 20 February 2023, 27 February 2023, 15 March 2023, 13 June 2023, 13 September 2023, 16 October 2023, 15 November 2023, 19 December 2023 and 16 January 2024.

[6] D5 has produced their set of documents to the Plaintiff through their Proposed Bundle of Documents (D5's Proposed BOD) which was served on 11 October 2023 to the Plaintiffs' solicitors. The Common Bundle of Documents (CBD) was complied, filed and served by the Plaintiff's solicitors on 10 January 2024.

[7] On 18 December 2023, the Plaintiff filed and served a Notice to Produce dated 18 December 2023 to D5s' solicitors. D5 objected, on the basis that the documents sought to be discovered were far too wide, irrelevant and/or inappropriate.

[8] Approximately, three (3) months later after the Notice to Produce, the Plaintiff filed encl 68 on 22 March 2024.

[9] Accordingly, the Plaintiff is seeking for discovery of documents relating to the operation and/or management of an account number 100090150718 in the name of Atlasinar Sdn Bhd, the 3rd Defendant (D3), which was opened and maintained at D5 (Account). This Account was used and operated by D3 to receive payments totalling RM10,020,260.00 (Payments) from the Plaintiff, intended for the supply of nitrile gloves from D3, when it turned out that D3 has been wound up by the time the Payments were made into the Account.

[10] The documents sought for discovery are:

(i) Request (1) - List of Documents pertaining to the account opening forms and other documents relating to the Account;

(ii) Request (2) - List of Documents pertaining to any documents disclosing the identities of the authorised signatories to the Account;

(iii) Request (3) - List of Documents pertaining to any documents disclosing the identities of the authorised cheque signatories to the Account;

(iv) Request (4) - List of Documents pertaining to all bank statements in respect of the Account from opening of the Account, including July 2022, to this date;

(v) Request (5) - List of Documents pertaining to all entries in the books of the Account and the documentation relating to the inflow and outflow of funds from the Account;

(vi) Request (6) - List of Documents pertaining to all debit vouchers, fund transfers applications, bank GIRO payments, Real-time Electronic Transfer of Funds and Securities System (RENTAS) payments, telegraphic transfer, Bank order and any other related documents relating to the said Account from 1 December 2020 to this date;

(vii) Request (7) - List of Documents pertaining to all documents on the opening of and/or application of Automated Teller Mach

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top