Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD – Appellant
Versus
KHOO SOO HEAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. public policy against gambling in malaysia (Para 1 , 2 , 7) |
| 2. jurisdiction and process for registering foreign judgments (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of the credit agreement and its enforcement (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. consequences of the default judgment in singapore (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. service of notice and additional implications (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 6. arguments presented by jd and jc (Para 23 , 24) |
| 7. registered judgments criteria under reja 1958 (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. delay and its implications for applications to set aside judgments (Para 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 46 , 47) |
| 9. enforceability of singapore judgment in relation to public policy arguments (Para 50 , 51 , 53) |
| 10. public policy considerations in enforcing foreign judgments (Para 65 , 66 , 70) |
| 11. judgment on the application to set aside registration of judgment (Para 75 , 76) |
(Enclosure 17: Application By Judgment Debtor To Set Aside The Registration Of a Foreign Judgment)
[1] Gambling is widely regarded as a vice and as being against public policy in Malaysia. Nonetheless, it is an undeniable reality that individuals continue to engage in gambling for a vari
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
