HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TANDA BESTARI DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH HASIL DALAM NEGERI (ENCL 1) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review application details and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. court's reasoning on merits and legal standards. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments and contentions by both parties. (Para 7) |
(Lampiran 1)
Introduction
[1] The applicant applied for Judicial Review to quash the decision of the Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri (DGIR), alleging it was illegal, void, beyond authority, breached natural justice, was irrational or unreasonable, denied the applicant's legitimate expectation, and sought further relief as stated in the application at L1.
[2] The applicant was granted leave to apply for Judicial Review (JR) under O 53 r 3 of the Rules of Court 2012 (RC 2012) on 13 September 2023:
[3] For ease of reference, I reproduced the said application (L1):
"(1) THAT the applicant be granted leave of this Honourable Court to apply for:
(a) An Order of Certiorari to quash the respondent's decision, which is deemed to have been made on 7 March 2023 and communicated to the applicant on the same date on the grounds that the said Decision was illegal, void, unlawful and/or in excess of authority, made in breach of principles of natural justice, had been irrat
Wiramuda (M) Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
Obata-Ambak Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd And Other Appeals
Arumugam Pillai v. Government of Malaysia
Pelangi Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
Semenyih Jaya Sdn Bhd v. Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat & Another Case
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.