Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
INDERPAL SINGH SIMINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MSIG INSURANCE (MALAYSIA) BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. insurance indemnity claim arising from an accident. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. key issues for determination in the case. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. plaintiff's testimony and evidence regarding the accident. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. defendant's testimony and evidence challenging the plaintiff's account. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. adherence to insurance policy notification requirements. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. assessment of the occurrence of the accident. (Para 32 , 33 , 35 , 39) |
| 7. weather conditions as a factor in the accident. (Para 46 , 47 , 50 , 51) |
| 8. contested expert analyses regarding the accident mechanism. (Para 52 , 54 , 56 , 62) |
| 9. analysis of paint residue found on the vehicle. (Para 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 10. defendant's burden of proof regarding fraud allegations. (Para 69 , 70 , 72 , 73) |
| 11. court's conclusion on liability and fraud. (Para 85 , 86 , 89 , 90) |
| 12. plaintiff awarded rm900,000 as a settlement. (Para 93) |
(Post-Trial)
[1] This is an own damage insurance indemnity claim brought by the Plaintiff against its insurer, the Defendant, arising from a contentious and vigorously disputed accident involv
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
