Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PERBADANAN PUTRAJAYA – Appellant
Versus
DAMANSARA REALTY (JOHOR) SDN BHD & OTHER CASES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction in adjudication applications (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. grounds for challenging adjudicator's decision (Para 5 , 33 , 34) |
| 3. factual background of the development agreement and claims (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. court's reasoning and findings on jurisdictional matters (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 35 , 36) |
(Encl 1)
[1] In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya ("PP") had applied to this court under s 15(b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA") to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10 January 2025 ("AD") given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd ("DRSB").
[2] We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to s 16 CIPAA.
[3] Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with s 28 CIPAA.
[4] All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this court.
[5] In support of OS 24, PP had, to surmise, relied on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
