NG MEE YEE & ANOR vs PP - 2025 MarsdenLR 3194

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:Chan Chee Wai ,Respondent Advocate: Dhiya Syazwani Izyan Mohd Akhir,Mohd Fairuz Johari

Table of Content
1. accused of drug trafficking. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of the police raid. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. prosecution witnesses and prima facie case. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. defence of the appellants. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. concept and elements of possession. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. knowledge and mental element in possession. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
7. conduct of appellants and inferences drawn. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
8. inference of knowledge based on conduct. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
9. credibility of police witnesses upheld. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
10. dna evidence not critical for conviction. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
11. visibility of drugs found. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70)
12. appellants' control over discovered drugs. (Para 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75)
13. role of potential witnesses addressed. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80)
14. prosecution's burden of proof discussed. (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85)
15. court's interpretation of possession and knowledge. (Para 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90)
16. conclusion on possession and access limits. (Para 9