Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
ANANDA KUMAR KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
NG CHIN TAI & ORS (ENCLS 1 7 & 36) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal and prior decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. recognition of undisputed facts and prior judgment details. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of the first garnishee proceedings. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. overview of the third garnishee proceedings. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. issues on debts accruing and procedural adherence. (Para 22 , 23 , 32) |
| 6. court's findings regarding deductions and agreements. (Para 24 , 25 , 28) |
| 7. identification of procedural impropriety. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. discussion on res judicata. (Para 42 , 46 , 48) |
| 9. analysis on statute of limitations. (Para 76 , 84) |
| 10. final conclusion and orders issued. (Para 89) |
(Enclosure 36 - Appeal To Judge In Chambers)
Introduction
[1] On 3 April 2024, the Garnishee (Respondent) filed an application (Enclosure 7) to strike out the Appelant's (Plaintiff) Notice of Application (Ex-Parte) dated 23 February 2024 and to set aside the Order to Show Cause dated 6 March 2024 on the ground that the application (encl 1) is res judicata.
[2] Not satisfied with the decision, an appeal was filed to the High Court. This Court on 26th of June 2025 has affirmed the decision of the Learned Deputy Registrar (DR)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
