INDUSTRIAL COURT SARAWAK
AMRAN MAHMUD – Appellant
Versus
SYARIKAT SESCO BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for unlawful dismissal. (Para 1 , 1 , 2) |
| 2. documents and evidence established. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. detailed facts of the claimant's employment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. standard of proof in employment misconduct. (Para 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. fiduciary nature of employer-employee relationship. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. details of charges against the claimant. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 7. standards regarding sexual harassment. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. cow2’s testimony supports allegations. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. claimant’s denial and defense. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 10. court's findings on just cause. (Para 55 , 60 , 61) |
| 11. court's conclusion on dismissal validity. (Para 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 124) |
[1] This is an order of reference dated 25 October 2024 by the Director General of Industrial Relations Department pursuant to s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 arising out of the alleged dismissal of Amran Bin Mahmud (the claimant) by Syarikat Sesco Berhad (the respondent) on 1 August 2024.
Introduction
[2] This is a claim for unlawful dismissal of the claimant against the respondent ("the company") without j
Ireka Construction Berhad v. Chantiravathan a/l Subramaniam James
Menara Panglobal Sdn Bhd v. Arokianathan Sivapiragasam
Tan Lay Peng v. RHB Bank Berhad & Anor
Azahari Shahrom & Anor v. Associated Pan Malaysia Cement Sdn Bhd
Harry Wong Wei Chen v. Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS)
Ridzuan Yahya v. Air Asia X Berhad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.