Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ENDAU GEMILANG SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KEMENTERIAN KEWANGAN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's discovery application pending. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of land sale agreement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. plaintiff's argument for document necessity. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. defendant's counterarguments on disclosure. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. criteria for discovery applications established. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. burden of proof in discovery applications. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. court's rationale against fishing expeditions. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. valuation report deemed sufficient. (Para 39) |
(Enclosure 14)
Introduction
[1] This is the Plaintiff's Application for Discovery (encl 14) under O 24 r 3 and/or r 7 and/or O 12 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC 2012).
[2] This Court allows encl 14 in part, by allowing only the valuation report dated 19 May 2020 pertaining to a land held under HSD 3457, PT 457, Mukim Klang, Daerah Klang, Negeri Selangor (Land) but not Minutes of the Cabinet meeting. The reasons are as deliberated.
Brief Facts
[3] There was a letter of offer dated 31 January 2012 issued by D1 to the Plaintiff on these conditions:
(a) The sale of the Land is s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
