Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MALAYSIAN TRADE UNION CONGRESS & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI TENAGA AIR & KOMUNIKASI & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. test of locus standi for judicial review (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. history of water service privatization in selangor (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. application for judicial review and reliefs sought (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. outcomes of the judicial review application (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. judicial commissioner's rationale for locus standi (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. court of appeal's view on locus standi (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. minority opinion on disclosure in public interest. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 8. appellants’ arguments on the test of locus standi (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. arguments on test for locus standi. (Para 29) |
| 10. respondents’ counterarguments on locus standi (Para 37 , 38) |
| 11. respondents' argument against disclosure. (Para 39) |
| 12. court's analysis on substantive locus standi (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
[1] This appeal centres on the test of locus standi as propounded by the then Supreme Court in Government Of Malaysia v. Lim Kit Siang & Another Case, 1988 MarsdenLR 802 . Leave to appeal was given by this Court on 30 January 2013 for the appellants to appeal against the majority decision of the Court of Appeal dated 25 February 2011 wherein the respondents' appeal against the entire de
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
